I have a friend, who will remain anonymous, who works at Google as a product manager. He does not work with Google Analytics. One night we had this heated discussion of how Google Analytics played into their advertising and revenue models. He assured me that all these departments were, and would always be, independent. This was the inspiration for ‘Does running Google Analytics affect your SEM?‘
Several months later, Google announces Benchmarking, which allows you to “compare report data against industry verticals and gain broader context for your site.” More importantly, it lets Google use the data from thousands of website to fine tune it’s search and advertising algorithms to maximize profit like any good company should.
But since this feature is for “my benefit”, I decided to take a look.
Since I just moved the analytics for Simple Pixel over to Google Analytics last week, we are looking at a pretty small set of data. Nonetheless, it is obvious to see the value of the report it produced.
Comparison
For comparison, each site is categorized into one of three groups based on the number of visits received: small, medium, and large (outliers are removed). Based on my stellar numbers, and those of the benchmark, I am going to guess I am in ’small.’

In addition to your size classification, you can compare to a particular category, such as ‘Marketing Services.’ Each of these groups has a minimum of 100 websites in it.
Here are my issues with this:
- I have no idea what category I am in, Google doesn’t tell you.
- I have no idea how are they determining which category I am in. Does it analyze my content, keywords, etc? Most websites don’t fit neatly into one category. Shouldn’t I be allowed to tell Google how to categorize my site?
- If I don’t know how I was grouped, then what am I comparing? I have no point of reference.
- What constitutes a ‘medium’ site? 200 visits? 200,000 visits?
Basically all this has told me is that for most sites that are ’small,’ I am getting a lot more traffic than most. Great. That and $1 will get me a soda.
I could go through each section on the benchmark report, but that would be tedious and boring.
So what’s my point? I have a two:
- This feature, as it stands, it a joke. The only value it provides is to Google.
- Benchmarking is a great idea and everyone should do it, but set your own benchmarks, don’t let some automated software make some assumptions.
Set benchmarks against your own traffic, using historical data. Look at your own patterns over different time periods and sources of traffic. Here are a few stats that are typically good things to benchmark:
- Visitors - total, unique, returning
- Conversions
- Cost per conversion
- ROI
- Total page views
- Visits by sources of traffic
Recent Comments